← Registry tracker

Undermind

Undermind is your AI co-researcher for the scientific literature. Ask a research question and Undermind searches the literature for you. It follows citation trails, evaluates hundreds of papers, and comes back with a ranked reading list rather than a page of keyword matches. With Undermind you can: Run deep literature searches. Undermind's search agents explore a research question for a few minutes, then report back with a summary and a ranked list of relevant papers. Look up papers by topic, author, title, DOI, or citation relationships (papers citing or cited by a paper you know), with abstracts and citation metrics. Ask questions about a paper's full text, including its figures, tables, and equations, and check the answers against the source. Keep your work organized in workspaces with folders, starred papers, saved searches, and notes, all synced with your account at undermind.ai. Scientists at thousands of research institutions use Undermind, from university labs to pharma R&D teams. Use it to check whether an idea is new, get oriented in an unfamiliar field, or track down the one method paper you need. You'll need an Undermind account (free or paid) and to sign in when connecting.

View in the Claude registry
Integration type
Connector
Verification status
Community connector
Platform
Claude
Category
Data & Analytics

The broad Category that contains the Primary Subcategory.

Primary Subcategory
Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants

The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.

Secondary Subcategories
None listed

Other Subcategories where the Integration is visible.

Access
Account required
First tracked
2026-08-03
Tool count
24
Geography
US

Claude Discoverability Score

Live · refreshed daily. Last refreshed

Undermind in Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants

0/100
Invisible

#7of 8competitors

This is the score for the Integration’s Primary Category, Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants. Undermind's tools align with this Category, which is why we measure it here. Claude did not find it in connector search, show it in the connector picker, or invoke it in the measured contested Runs. That is why the score is 0.

How this score is measured

What we measure

One core score. Three important factors to discoverability.

  • Picked

    · 0/100
    Sets the score
  • Found

    · 0/100
    Diagnostic
  • Positioned

    · 0/100
    Diagnostic
5 scoredVerified connectors by score · Community connectors A–Z
Primary Subcategory
1Consensus100/100
2Elicit48/100
3bioRxiv19/100
4Scholar Gateway4/100
5Scite0/100
BioSkepsisOrganic discovery is pending verificationGet notified when verified
UndermindOrganic discovery is pending verificationGet notified when verified
カーリル for AIOrganic discovery is pending verificationGet notified when verified
Score explained

What does 0/100 mean?

0 is Undermind's rounded picker appearance rate. It appeared in the connector picker, or Claude invoked it directly, in 0% of contested conversations. All three measures are important to discoverability: Picked determines the headline score, Found shows how often Claude found Undermind in connector search, and Positioned shows where it appeared in the picker.

InvisibleBuriedEmergingCompetitiveWinning

Undermind is 10 points from Buried.

FoundDiagnostic

Whether Claude found your Connector in connector search. It must be Found before it can reach the picker, but the score counts picker appearances—not search results.

PickedMain score

How often your Connector appeared in the picker, or Claude invoked it directly, across contested conversations. This percentage is the Discoverability Score; the headline number is rounded.

PositionedDiagnostic

What position your Connector appeared in when it was shown in the picker. This shows prominence, but it does not affect the score.

Read the full scoring methodologyRecommended guideHow to get your Claude Connector organically discoveredFollow the practical steps agents use to find, shortlist, and choose your Connector.
Tools

24 tools agents can invoke

Undermind FAQ
How do I improve a Community connector's discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are Undermind alternatives on Claude?

As of 2026-08-14, Undermind competes with Consensus, Elicit, bioRxiv, Scholar Gateway, Scite, BioSkepsis, カーリル for AI in Claude Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where does Undermind rank in Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants on Claude?

As of 2026-08-14, Undermind ranks #7 of 8 in Claude Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants with a Discoverability Score of 0/100 (Invisible).

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.