BioSkepsis
BioSkepsis runs a full agentic life-science literature review from inside Claude and returns a citation-grounded brief. Ask a life-science research question and the connector plans the work, searches the peer-reviewed literature, reads full text where available, screens for retracted papers and questioned cell lines, and synthesizes a structured brief: a headline answer, ranked and tiered sources, sub-question coverage, and a composite Trust Index. A run executes in the background and takes several minutes, so the workflow spans a few tools. start_research_run returns a run id, get_research_status reports live progress (the current phase and papers found), and get_research_brief returns the finished brief once it is ready. list_recent_briefs and get_brief re-open earlier briefs, and create_research_feed turns a finished run into a research feed that emails you new related papers on a daily, weekly, or monthly schedule. Runs are scoped to your own BioSkepsis account and use your plan's monthly brief allowance. A run you start from Claude is also saved to your BioSkepsis account as a research chat, so you can open the full brief, inspect every source, and ask follow-up questions in the app. Built for researchers, clinicians, and R&D teams who want evidence-grounded answers with the sources shown, not unsourced prose. BioSkepsis covers 40M+ papers across the life sciences, and never trains on your data.
- Integration type
- Connector
- Verification status
Community connector- Platform
- Claude
- Primary Subcategory
- Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants
- Secondary Subcategories
- None listed
- Brand
- BioSkepsis
- Access
- Account required
- First tracked
- 2026-07-23
- Tool count
- 6
- Geography
- US
The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.
Other Subcategories where the Integration is visible.
Claude Discoverability Score
Live · refreshed daily. Last refreshedBioSkepsis in Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants
#6of 8competitors
This is the score for the Integration’s Primary Category, Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants. BioSkepsis's tools align with this Category, which is why we measure it here. Claude did not find it in connector search, show it in the connector picker, or invoke it in the measured contested Runs. That is why the score is 0.
How this score is measuredWhat we measure
One core score. Three important factors to discoverability.
- Sets the score
Picked
· 0/100 - Diagnostic
Found
· 0/100 - Diagnostic
Positioned
· 0/100
Competing in Claude Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants
View CategoryWhat does 0/100 mean?
0 is BioSkepsis's rounded picker appearance rate. It appeared in the connector picker, or Claude invoked it directly, in 0% of contested conversations. All three measures are important to discoverability: Picked determines the headline score, Found shows how often Claude found BioSkepsis in connector search, and Positioned shows where it appeared in the picker.
BioSkepsis is 10 points from Buried.
FoundDiagnostic
Whether Claude found your Connector in connector search. It must be Found before it can reach the picker, but the score counts picker appearances—not search results.
PickedMain score
How often your Connector appeared in the picker, or Claude invoked it directly, across contested conversations. This percentage is the Discoverability Score; the headline number is rounded.
PositionedDiagnostic
What position your Connector appeared in when it was shown in the picker. This shows prominence, but it does not affect the score.
6 tools agents can invoke
How do I improve a Community connector's discoverability?
The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.
What are BioSkepsis alternatives on Claude?
As of 2026-08-14, BioSkepsis competes with Consensus, Elicit, bioRxiv, Scholar Gateway, Scite, Undermind, カーリル for AI in Claude Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants, ranked by public Discoverability Score.
Where does BioSkepsis rank in Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants on Claude?
As of 2026-08-14, BioSkepsis ranks #6 of 8 in Claude Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants with a Discoverability Score of 0/100 (Invisible).
Where is this profile measured?
This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.