← Registry tracker

Elicit

Access a corpus of over 125 million academic papers. Search for relevant literature using natural language queries, create structured reports that extract and synthesize data across papers, and retrieve detailed report results — all programmatically. Built for life sciences R&D workflows, the server enables agents to rapidly survey evidence, compare findings across studies, and surface key data points without manual literature review, accelerating everything from target discovery to systematic evidence assessment.

View in the Claude registry
Integration type
Connector
Verification status
Verified connector
Platform
Claude
Category
Data & Analytics

The broad Category that contains the Primary Subcategory.

Primary Subcategory
Academic Literature & Citation Search

The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.

Secondary Subcategories
Academic Literature Search & Research AssistantsBiomedical & Pharma Research Intelligence

Other Subcategories where the Integration is visible.

Brand
Elicit
Access
Account required
First tracked
2026-06-19
Tool count
5
Geography
US

Claude Discoverability Score

Live · refreshed daily. Last refreshed

Elicit in Academic Literature & Citation Search

7/100
Invisible

#4of 8competitors

Shown to buyers in 6.9% of contested Runs.

How this score is measured
Improve your score Talk to our team

What we measure

One core score. Three important factors to discoverability.

  • Picked

    · 6.9/100
    Sets the score

  • Found

    · 1.9/100
    Diagnostic

  • Positioned

    · 9.5/100
    Diagnostic
Primary Subcategory

Competing in Claude Academic Literature & Citation Search

View Category
#4 of 8ranked by public Discoverability Score
Primary Subcategory
1Scholar Gateway62/100
2Consensus59/100
3bioRxiv10/100
4Elicit7/100
5alphaXiv0/100
Score explained

What does 7/100 mean?

7 is Elicit's rounded picker appearance rate. It appeared in the connector picker, or Claude invoked it directly, in 6.9% of contested conversations. All three measures are important to discoverability: Picked determines the headline score, Found shows how often Claude found Elicit in connector search, and Positioned shows where it appeared in the picker.

InvisibleBuriedEmergingCompetitiveWinning

Elicit is 3 points from Buried.

FoundDiagnostic

Whether Claude found your Connector in connector search. It must be Found before it can reach the picker, but the score counts picker appearances—not search results.

PickedMain score

How often your Connector appeared in the picker, or Claude invoked it directly, across contested conversations. This percentage is the Discoverability Score; the headline number is rounded.

PositionedDiagnostic

What position your Connector appeared in when it was shown in the picker. This shows prominence, but it does not affect the score.

Read the full scoring methodologyRecommended guideHow to get your Claude Connector organically discoveredFollow the practical steps agents use to find, shortlist, and choose your Connector.
Tools

5 tools agents can invoke

Elicit FAQ
How do I improve a Verified connector's discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are Elicit alternatives on Claude?

As of 2026-08-14, Elicit competes with Scholar Gateway, Consensus, bioRxiv, alphaXiv, Scholar Feed, SciSpace, Source Library in Claude Academic Literature & Citation Search, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where does Elicit rank in Academic Literature & Citation Search on Claude?

As of 2026-08-14, Elicit ranks #4 of 8 in Claude Academic Literature & Citation Search with a Discoverability Score of 7/100 (Invisible).

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.