← Registry tracker

Scholar Feed

Search 600,000+ CS/AI research papers with citation graphs, full text, embeddings, and BibTeX. Papers are scraped from ArXiv daily and ranked by novelty and quality with AI. Built for researchers running a literature review where they already work: search, trace citations, pull full text, and export BibTeX in the same session.

View in the Claude registry
Integration type
Connector
Verification status
Community connector
Platform
Claude
Category
Data & Analytics

The broad Category that contains the Primary Subcategory.

Primary Subcategory
Academic Literature & Citation Search

The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.

Secondary Subcategories
None listed

Other Subcategories where the Integration is visible.

Access
Account required
First tracked
2026-08-05
Tool count
25
Geography
US

Claude Discoverability Score

Live · refreshed daily. Last refreshed

Scholar Feed in Academic Literature & Citation Search

0/100
Invisible

#6of 8competitors

This is the score for the Integration’s Primary Category, Academic Literature & Citation Search. Scholar Feed's tools align with this Category, which is why we measure it here. Claude did not find it in connector search, show it in the connector picker, or invoke it in the measured contested Runs. That is why the score is 0.

How this score is measured

What we measure

One core score. Three important factors to discoverability.

  • Picked

    · 0/100
    Sets the score
  • Found

    · 0/100
    Diagnostic
  • Positioned

    · 0/100
    Diagnostic
Primary Subcategory
5 scoredVerified connectors by score · Community connectors A–Z
Primary Subcategory
1Scholar Gateway62/100
2Consensus59/100
3bioRxiv10/100
4Elicit7/100
5alphaXiv0/100
Scholar FeedOrganic discovery is pending verificationGet notified when verified
SciSpaceOrganic discovery is pending verificationGet notified when verified
Source LibraryOrganic discovery is pending verificationGet notified when verified
Score explained

What does 0/100 mean?

0 is Scholar Feed's rounded picker appearance rate. It appeared in the connector picker, or Claude invoked it directly, in 0% of contested conversations. All three measures are important to discoverability: Picked determines the headline score, Found shows how often Claude found Scholar Feed in connector search, and Positioned shows where it appeared in the picker.

InvisibleBuriedEmergingCompetitiveWinning

Scholar Feed is 10 points from Buried.

FoundDiagnostic

Whether Claude found your Connector in connector search. It must be Found before it can reach the picker, but the score counts picker appearances—not search results.

PickedMain score

How often your Connector appeared in the picker, or Claude invoked it directly, across contested conversations. This percentage is the Discoverability Score; the headline number is rounded.

PositionedDiagnostic

What position your Connector appeared in when it was shown in the picker. This shows prominence, but it does not affect the score.

Read the full scoring methodologyRecommended guideHow to get your Claude Connector organically discoveredFollow the practical steps agents use to find, shortlist, and choose your Connector.
Tools

25 tools agents can invoke

Scholar Feed FAQ
How do I improve a Community connector's discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are Scholar Feed alternatives on Claude?

As of 2026-08-14, Scholar Feed competes with Scholar Gateway, Consensus, bioRxiv, Elicit, alphaXiv, SciSpace, Source Library in Claude Academic Literature & Citation Search, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where does Scholar Feed rank in Academic Literature & Citation Search on Claude?

As of 2026-08-14, Scholar Feed ranks #6 of 8 in Claude Academic Literature & Citation Search with a Discoverability Score of 0/100 (Invisible).

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.