Folionomiq

Measure an investment portfolio from real price history: how many independent bets it holds, what you own through your funds, and what past crises did to it in money.

View in the Claude registry
Integration details

Description

Folionomiq measures an investment portfolio from its price history, so Claude can answer questions about it with figures it cannot compute on its own. What it measures: - How many independent bets the holdings really add up to, and which holding carries more of the risk than its share of the money. - What you own through your funds: the companies added up across funds, with how much of the money that view covers. - What past crises (2008, 2020, 2022 and others) did to this money, in money, and how long it took to come back. - Whether a yearly withdrawal, raised with inflation, would have lasted on the portfolio's own history. - What a change would do before it is made: adding a fund, changing a weight, or comparing up to eight portfolios on the same window. It accepts tickers, fund names or ISINs; amounts, percentages or share counts; many exchanges and base currencies. Descriptive only: every figure is measured on end-of-day prices over a window named beside it. No forecasts, no buy, sell or hold advice, and no score of how good a portfolio is. No account and no sign-in. Holdings are used to compute the answer; only anonymous counts are kept, never who asked (see the privacy policy).

Integration type
Connector
Verification status
Community connector
Platform
Claude
Category
Finance

The broad Category that contains the Primary Subcategory.

Primary Subcategory
Wealth & Portfolio Tracking Dashboards

The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.

Secondary Subcategories
None listed

Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.

Access
No account required
First tracked
2026-09-30
Tool count
22
Geography
US
Agent DiscoverabilityClaude Discoverability Score

Claude Connector discovery is coming soon

Community Connectors only appear in Claude’s registry.Once verified, organic discovery begins and we can calculate your score.Read more about Community Connector verification.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

What discovery looks like

Claude showing a list of relevant Connectors in a conversation

Claude can surface verified Connectors when they match a user’s Prompt.

Primary Subcategory
0 scoredVerified connectors by score · Community connectors A–Z
Primary Subcategory
—AllinvestviewPending VerificationGet notified
—Collation MCP ServerPending VerificationGet notified
—Envestnet TamaracPending VerificationGet notified
—FinaryPending VerificationGet notified
—Flanks AggregatePending VerificationGet notified
—FlygaPending VerificationGet notified
—FolionomiqPending VerificationGet notified
—FolioTrackPending VerificationGet notified
—GenTwoPending VerificationGet notified
—IBI SMARTPending VerificationGet notified
—InstaportPending VerificationGet notified
—Plutus | Investment AdviserPending VerificationGet notified
—Production Truthifi MCPPending VerificationGet notified
—ValYouPending VerificationGet notified
Tools

22 tools agents can invoke

Recommended guideHow to get your Claude Connector organically discoveredFollow the practical steps agents use to find, shortlist, and choose your Connector.Read guide
FAQs

Folionomiq Claude Connector FAQ

How the directory, categories and Discoverability Score work.

Read the methodology
How do I improve Folionomiq's Claude Connector discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are Folionomiq alternatives on Claude?

As of 2026-10-07, Folionomiq competes with Addepar MCP, Allinvestview, Black Diamond, Collation MCP Server, Envestnet Tamarac, Finary, Flanks Aggregate, Flourish Financial and 9 more in Claude Wealth & Portfolio Tracking Dashboards, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.