← Registry tracker

Rams

Design review for the UI your agent writes

Primary Subcategory
Test Automation & QA
View in the Claude registry
Integration details

Description

Rams is a design review and UI code review tool for coding agents — it reviews the frontend code your agent writes, before it ships. Add the connector and approve access: you sign in, or create a free account, as part of that step. No API key to paste, no CI to configure. Then ask your agent to review the component you just changed. Point it at the files you changed and it returns issues with severity, category, and exact file:line: contrast that fails accessibility, tap targets under the minimum, a timer that never clears, spacing off the scale, motion with no reduced-motion guard. quick_review answers in about ten seconds and costs a fifth of a review credit — run it constantly while you edit. review_files is the deeper pass: a 0-100 design quality score plus git-apply-able patches, for when you want something to keep. verify_fixes confirms your fixes landed, free. Reviews can include before/after screenshots: Rams renders the component, applies its own patch, re-renders, and ships the pair only when the fix provably landed. It runs on a taste engine of 300+ rules across accessibility, typography, color, layout, motion, components, and native (SwiftUI/HIG) — the same engine behind Rams' GitHub App, which reviews pull requests for design quality. Free to start — every account includes reviews each month, shared across this connector and the GitHub App. Approving the connector lets it run reviews and spend that workspace's review credits; it reads only the files you hand it.

Integration type
Connector
Verification status
Community connector
Platform
Claude
Category
Developer Tools

The broad Category that contains the Primary Subcategory.

Primary Subcategory
Test Automation & QA

The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.

Secondary Subcategories
None listed

Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.

Brand
Rams
Access
Account required
First tracked
2026-08-21
Tool count
4
Geography
US

Claude Discoverability Score

Claude Connector discovery is coming soon

Community Connectors only appear in Claude’s registry.Once verified, organic discovery begins and we can calculate your score.Read more about Community Connector verification.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

What discovery looks like

Claude showing a list of relevant Connectors in a conversation

Claude can surface verified Connectors when they match a user’s Prompt.

Primary Subcategory
11 scoredVerified connectors by score · Community connectors A–Z
Primary Subcategory
1Atlassian Rovo84/100
2YouTrack61/100
3Linear60/100
4Natoma27/100
5Sentry21/100
AccessLintPending VerificationGet notified
AutonomaPending VerificationGet notified
MeticulousPending VerificationGet notified
OctoPerf MCPPending VerificationGet notified
QA.techPending VerificationGet notified
RamsPending VerificationGet notified
StarkPending VerificationGet notified
Recommended guideHow to get your Claude Connector organically discoveredFollow the practical steps agents use to find, shortlist, and choose your Connector.Read guide
Tools

4 tools agents can invoke

Rams FAQ
How do I improve a Community connector's discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are Rams alternatives on Claude?

As of 2026-09-12, Rams competes with Atlassian Rovo, YouTrack, Linear, Natoma, Sentry, DevRev, Fullstory, Subtext, Runway (runway.team), Jam, monday.com, AccessLint, Autonoma, Meticulous, OctoPerf MCP, QA.tech, Stark in Claude Test Automation & QA, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.